AI Agents: Innovation or Risk?
- Katarzyna Celińska

- Oct 13
- 2 min read
According to Accenture’s latest Pulse of Change survey, 9 out of 10 executives plan to increase their AI investments in 2025 — even amid economic uncertainty. But here’s the catch: the pace of adoption far exceeds organizational readiness.
The State of AI Agent Adoption
☑️ 87% of leaders say AI agents are driving a new era of process transformation.
☑️ 63% are already investing in AI agents, while 27% are integrating them across business functions.
☑️ 86% of executives claim they are “preparing” their workforce for AI — yet 75% admit the change is outpacing training capabilities.
☑️ Only 42% of employees feel equipped to use AI tools effectively, and 33% believe AI developments are outstripping their training.
This disconnect between ambition and readiness creates what researchers call a “resilience illusion” — a belief that AI enhances competitiveness, while in reality, most organizations are unprepared for the operational, ethical, and security challenges it brings.

photo: https://pl.freepik.com/
I understand the hype around AI — especially around AI agents — and I also understand that without taking risks, there are no rewards. But let’s be realistic: this technology is still immature, unproven, and highly unpredictable, especially from a cybersecurity standpoint.
The risks are clear:
☑️ Model exploitation and data leakage through unmonitored agent behaviors.
☑️ Hallucinations or decision errors in mission-critical processes.
☑️ Shadow AI deployments outside corporate oversight.
☑️ Regulatory uncertainty over accountability and explainability.
Doing prototyping or small pilot projects around AI agents is great — that’s how innovation starts. But jumping into full-scale enterprise deployment is, in my opinion, a very risky business.
My advice for adopting any emerging technology:
✅ Start small, test, and learn.
✅ Continuously analyze and mitigate the risks.
✅ Prioritize cybersecurity controls, governance, and human oversight.
Organizations should treat AI like they treat any other high-risk innovation: with structured risk management, layered defense, and continuous validation.
The goal is not to stop progress, but to manage the risks smartly — so that the reward outweighs the exposure.
Author: Sebastian Burgemejster





Comments